Factfulness is a posthumous book by statistician and physician Hans Rosling. This book is co-written with his son, Ola Rosling, and his daughter-in-law, Anna Rosling Rönnlund. The premise of the book is that most humans are wrong about the state of the world. We all exaggerate the negatives in the world. We believe the world is poorer, less healthy, and more dangerous than the statistics suggest. Instead of dividing the world into developed/developing, Hans suggests we should have four income brackets. Plus, he outlines ten instincts that prevent the human race from progressing. This book became an international bestseller and was recommended by Bill Gates as one of his five best books of 2018.
About Hans Rosling
Hans Rosling was a Swedish physician, academic, and public speaker. Alongside Anna, Hans founded the Gapminder Foundation and developed the Trendalyzer software system. Hans advocated for data analysis as a way of exploring development issues.
About Ola Rosling
Ola Rosling is Hans Rosling’s son. Ola specializes in statistics and is known for his work with Gapminder on changing the global quality of life. He is currently the chairman, director, and co-founder of the Gapminder Foundation.
About Anna Rosling Rönnlund
Anna Rosling Rönnlund is a Swedish designer who developed Trendalyzer alongside the other two authors of this book. She is currently the vice president for design and usability at Tendalyzer. Plus, she is the founder of Dollar Street. Dollar Street is a website that helps people visualize different streets of homes. This website helps people better understand how different cultures and incomes live around the world.
“Think about the world. War, violence, natural disasters, man-made disasters, corruption. Things are bad, and it feels like they are getting worse, right? The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer; and the number of poor just keeps increasing; and we will soon run out of resources unless we do something drastic. At least that’s the picture that most Westerners see in the media and carry around in their heads. I call it the overdramatic worldview. It’s stressful and misleading. In fact, the vast majority of the world’s population lives somewhere in the middle of the income scale. Perhaps they are not what we think of as middle class, but they are not living in extreme poverty. Their girls go to school, their children get vaccinated, they live in two-child families, and they want to go abroad on holiday, not as refugees. Step-by-step, year-by-year, the world is improving. Not on every single measure every single year, but as a rule. Though the world faces huge challenges, we have made tremendous progress. This is the fact-based worldview.”– Hans Rosling
The Gap Instinct
“Eighty-five percent of mankind is already inside the box that used to be named ‘developed world.’ The remaining 15 percent are mostly in between the two boxes. Only 13 countries, representing 6 percent of the world population, are still inside the ‘developing’ box.”– Hans Rosling
The gap instinct relates to how we tend to divide things into two groups. We exaggerate the gap between these two groups by giving them labels such as good vs. bad and rich vs. poor. The most prominent example of the gap instinct is how we identify countries as either developed or developing. These are labels that were introduced in the 1960s. This type of instinct is an ‘us’ vs. ‘them’ mentality.
The reality of the developed and developing labeling is that most people live in the middle now. There is no clear gap between developed and developing countries. Therefore, it is better to place them into four income levels. Level 1 would include the most extreme poverty, and level 4 would include the most developed.
“Low-income countries are much more developed than most people think. And vastly fewer people live in them. The idea of a divided world with a majority stuck in misery and deprivation is an illusion. A complete misconception. Simply wrong.”– Hans Rosling
To adopt a Factfulness approach, we must accept that most of our firsthand experiences are from level 4. Then, our secondhand experiences of other levels are based on our mass media. The mass media will always report on extraordinary events. Hence, our view of other levels will never be the reality.
The authors outline three warning signs that trigger your gap instinct:
- If you compare averages, you will produce gaps. However, there is often significant overlap in wealth between countries
- If you compare extremes, you are not showing the majority of people in a country
- If you are living in level 4, then everyone looks much poorer than you
The Negativity Instinct
“Does saying “things are improving” imply that everything is fine, and we should all relax and not worry? No, not at all. Is it helpful to have to choose between bad and improving? Definitely not. It’s both. It’s both bad and better. Better, and bad, at the same time. That is how we must think about the current state of the world.”– Hans Rosling
Secondly, as humans, we naturally focus more on the bad than the good. Hence, we also believe the world is getting worse. This is not the case. Instead, we misremember the past. Plus, journalists selectively report negative stories. Finally, we tend to respond with feelings instead of facts. This focus on feelings means that we feel uncomfortable saying the world is getting better. We feel uncomfortable because bad things are still happening.
We need to overcome this negative instinct by accepting bad things happen, but that the world can and is still improving. We must not let negative stories that seek to grab our attention warp the world’s reality. Plus, we must not look back at the past as if it was perfect. Many bad things happened in the past, and we should consider how things have improved.
The reason we struggle to see the world as improving is that things are often only improving gradually. Hence, we often do not hear about these improvements.
The Straight Line Instinct
As humans, we often wrongly assume that things in the world should move in a straight, linear direction. We expect that improvement in the world has to mean constant improvement with no dips. However, multiple things impact on the overall trend of things in the world.
The best way for us to control this error-filled instinct is to remember that curves can come in all shapes and sizes. We must also accept that straight lines are far less common than we think. If you have two points and connect them, you’ll have a straight line. However, add any third point that is not perfectly in-line with these points, and you have a curve.
The issue with this misconception is that it assumes that things are a certain way, and drastic action is required to change an upward or downward trend. Instead, if we look at the data as a curve, we can see dips in an upward trend. We can learn from these dips and see them as opportunities to learn.
The Fear Instinct
“Critical thinking is always difficult, but it’s almost impossible when we are scared. There’s no room for facts when our minds are occupied by fear.”– Hans Rosling
Fear was and is hugely important for our survival. However, fear is not useful when considering data. When we are afraid, we have a warped view of the world around us. Specifically, we tend to generate worst-case scenarios when provided with data. Evolutionarily we had to respond to all threats with a ‘worst-case scenario’ approach. This approach to fear helped us survive as a species but now makes us overestimate problems. However, this approach is not helpful when we are trying to utilize critical thinking.
The media’s portrayal of events encourages this fearful way of thinking. The news will broadcast the dangers of the world. However, the reality is that bad things still happen, but the outcomes of these bad things are far less severe than they used to be. This is not reported. Far fewer people are killed today than in the past. Natural disasters are not less common, but fewer people die from them as we are better equipped. The events that strike the most fear into us are some of the least common events: plane crashes, murders, nuclear leaks, and terrorism. These events account for less than 1% of deaths per year. In 2016, 40 million commercial passenger flights landed. Ten of these ended in fatal accidents. However, those ten are the ones journalists will report.
“The image of a dangerous world has never been broadcast more effectively than it is now, while the world has never been less violent and more safe.”– Hans Rosling
The Size Instinct
“The two aspects of the size instinct, together with the negativity instinct, make us systematically underestimate the progress that has been made in the world.” – Hans Rosling
We tend to overestimate the importance of single events or people. The authors provide an example of how people often attribute less child mortality to improvements in doctors and hospitals. We view fewer children dying as doctors saving more lives. However, the data would suggest that almost all of the increases in child survival rates are attributable to preventative measures outside of the hospital.
As humans, we like to make a narrative out of individual data points. The media preys on this instinct and will make a single event or fact sound more critical than it is.
To overcome the size instinct, it is essential to provide the event or fact with context. You can produce context by comparing this event to other examples. Additionally, if we are provided with a large number, we will often attribute more importance to it. This is because we struggle to understand large numbers. Therefore, to make the number more meaningful, you should always divide the total by another number. For example, you can divide by the total population; the new number will now be applicable to a person.
“To avoid getting things out of proportion you need only two magic tools: comparing and dividing.”– Hans Rosling
The Generalization Instinct
“[The generalization instinct] can make us mistakenly group together things, or people, or countries that are actually very different. It can make us assume everything or everyone in one category is similar. And, maybe most unfortunate of all, it can make us jump to conclusions about a whole category based on a few, or even just one, unusual example.” – Hans Rosling
People automatically generalize individual data points. We use stereotypes as a way to structure our thoughts, and they are generally very useful. However, this instinct can also warp our view of the world.
Firstly, our instinct to generalize can lead to us mistakenly grouping things that are very different—for example, linking two countries together.
Secondly, this instinct can make us think that everybody within one category is the same or very similar. This, coupled with making us jump to conclusions about an entire category based on one example, underpins things like racial prejudice.
The best way for you to beat this instinct is to experience new places and people. If you travel to new countries and visit their real homes, you will understand that we are all unique. This idea is pointed out by Anna’s Dollar Street website. People with the same earnings will have different cultures and different family dynamics.
The Destiny Instinct
This instinct is related to how we assume people, countries, religions, or cultures are destined to be a certain way. This instinct is based on our understanding of innate characteristics. Basing our understanding of others on these innate characteristics leads to us believing that things can never change.
The destiny instinct also makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint. We used to live in surroundings that would not change much; the only changes were seasonal ones. Therefore, associating a group with destiny was one of the only ways to unite a group. However, societies are no longer like this. We have ever-changing environments and a wide range of things we can connect over.
Additionally, we must remember that change is often slow. Things may look destined, but that is just because we struggle to notice small changes. Societies and cultures are in constant movement. Therefore, try and keep track of gradual improvements. If you struggle to see how things change over time, try and look at your parents’ or grandparents’ views. You will most likely see a tremendous difference, and this is due to small gradual changes.
The Single Perspective Instinct
“Being always in favor of or always against any particular idea makes you blind to information that doesn’t fit your perspective. This is usually a bad approach if you like to understand reality. Instead, constantly test your favorite ideas for weaknesses. Be humble about the extent of your expertise. Be curious about new information that doesn’t fit, and information from other fields. And rather than talking only to people who agree with you, or collecting examples that fit your ideas, see people who contradict you, disagree with you, and put forward different ideas as a great resource for understanding the world.”– Hans Rosling
Instead of adopting or considering multiple perspectives, we are always focused on single causes or solutions. Focusing on single causes makes us feel like our problems are easier to solve. However, this leads to a misunderstanding of the world. We will get a more accurate understanding of problems if we consider multiple perspectives and weigh up which has the most validity.
To overcome the single perspective instinct, you should always be testing ideas to see where they fall short. You should not reject new information that doesn’t fit your current viewpoint. Instead, be curious about this new information and identify if your ideas should change based on this new information. On top of this, you should actively seek out people who have different viewpoints than you. Having these people in your life will hugely improve your understanding of the world.
Finally, the authors encourage you to sometimes look beyond numbers. Data does have its limits, and real-life proof of concepts can be necessary when looking for solutions. The world is complex, and our problems and solutions should reflect that.
The Blame Instinct
“The blame instinct makes us exaggerate the importance of individuals or of particular groups. This instinct to find a guilty party derails our ability to develop a true, fact-based understanding of the world: it steals our focus as we obsess about someone to blame, then blocks our learning because once we have decided who to [blame] we stop looking for explanations elsewhere. This undermines our ability to solve the problem or prevent it from happening again because we are stuck with over simplistic finger-pointing, which distracts us from the more complex truth and prevents us from focusing our energy in the right places.”– Hans Rosling
The blame instinct is our instinct to find a clear reason for why something bad has happened. We tend to attribute bad things happening to bad individuals or intentions. This is another example of humans trying to find patterns. We try to find a reason for why something bad has happened. The blame instinct is our way of dealing with the unpredictable, confusing, and frightening nature of the world.
One of the most significant issues with our blame instinct is that we exaggerate the importance of individuals or groups in bad events. This blocks us from looking for more viable explanations of or solutions to the problem. In reality, most bad things are a combination of lots of interacting causes. The authors call this the system. Therefore, we should be looking at systems rather than individual people or groups.
Look for causes, not villains.
The Urgency Instinct
The urgency instinct is the instinct that makes us want to take action as soon as we perceive a danger. The issue with this instinct is it makes us stressed. Stress amplifies our other instincts and blocks us from thinking analytically. Finally, stress makes us take drastic actions that we would never normally consider.
Some problems are urgent, and we should work together to solve them. These are Global pandemics, financial collapses, world wars, climate change, and extreme poverty. If the problem does not fall under these categories, then urgency will only cloud your judgments.
One way to deal with the urgency instinct is to give yourself more time and provide yourself with more information. Additionally, be careful when considering predictions.
“This is data as you have never known it: it is data as therapy. It is understanding as a source of mental peace. Because the world is not as dramatic as it seems. Factfulness, like a healthy diet and regular exercise, can and should become part of your daily life. Start to practice it, and you will be able to replace your overdramatic worldview with a worldview based on facts. You will be able to get the world right without learning it by heart. You will make better decisions, stay alert to real dangers and possibilities, and avoid being constantly stressed about the wrong things.”– Hans Rosling
If you have feedback about this summary or would like to share what you have learned, comment below or tweet to us @storyshots.
New to StoryShots? Get the audio and animated versions of this summary and hundreds of other bestselling nonfiction books in our free top-ranking app. It’s been featured #1 by Apple, The Guardian, The UN, and Google in 175 countries.